Cezary Bielecki and Przemyslaw Wojcik, co-founders of Digital Forms
Przemysław Wójcik & Cezary Bielecki Co-Founders — Digital Forms
Profit Leak Diagnostic · Fixed scope

Your operation is losing money. You just don’t know where — or how much.

The Profit Leak Diagnostic maps every operational bottleneck in your business — manual work, data gaps, technology waste, and AI exposure — and attaches an annual cost figure to each one. You keep the output regardless of what you decide to do next.

No sales pitch. No commitment. 30 minutes to check fit.

Manual WallData BlindnessIT as a Black BoxAI FOMOAnnualised cost per findingROI-ordered prioritiesBoard-ready outputYou own the reportManual WallData BlindnessIT as a Black BoxAI FOMOAnnualised cost per findingROI-ordered prioritiesBoard-ready outputYou own the report
What we look for

Four places where mid-market operations leak profit.

Most companies at your scale have at least two of these active right now. All four are diagnosable. All four have a number attached.

01Manual Wall

Headcount compensating for missing automation

60–80 people clicking between disconnected systems. Staff manually re-entering data from one platform into another. Every new client means another hire, not a workflow change. The team is working hard. The systems are working against them.

Typical after a fix: 45 → 15-day cycle · hours/week back to the team
Try the Manual Wall Calculator →
02Data Blindness

Decisions made on data that's already wrong

Management reports assembled manually every two days. Leadership asking questions that take a week to answer. No real-time view of case volumes, throughput, or team capacity. Strategy built on instinct because the numbers aren't there when you need them.

Typical after a fix: reporting 5 days → same day
03IT as a Black Box

Nobody owns what your technology should be doing

The tools mostly do their job. What's missing is anyone who owns the bigger question of what they should be doing for the business. Nobody looks at two hundred spreadsheets and says stop, build one system instead. Nobody looks at five overlapping tools and asks which one should die. So the highest-impact, fastest-payoff move sits there unclaimed, because seeing it was never anyone's job.

15–25% of tech spend · typically undefended
04AI FOMO

AI is already inside your organisation. You just can't see it.

The market is moving fast on AI, and the pressure to keep up is real. Your own people are already using ChatGPT, Copilot, and consumer tools to get through the day — informally, with no strategy guiding it and no way to know whether it's actually helping. Benchmarks put that informal adoption at 40–60% of operational staff. In a regulated environment it also creates exposure your auditors would flag. The Diagnostic shows you where AI is already in use and what needs governing before it becomes a liability.

Typical after a fix: governed AI turns hours of manual work into minutes
How the diagnostic works

Four areas. One output.

You've seen where the margin leaks. Walk through how the diagnostic turns those four areas into a single ranked, costed report — and watch it build as you go.

Manual Wall
Data Blindness
IT as a Black Box
AI FOMO
Illustrative
STAGE 01
Strategic context
Working session
STAGE 02
Operational reality
Working session
STAGE 03
Findings review
Together
Stage 01 · with the room
What we map first
The strategic picture, in your words — before we touch a single number.
Your Profit Leak report Writing
Section 1
Where you stand
Business modelFee-per-claim administration
Revenue concentrationTop 50 clients ≈ 44%
18–24 month goalAbsorb an acquisition cleanly
Section 2
How it really runs
Departments & headcount268 staff · 10 departments
Technology landscape31 tools · 5 dormant but paid
Measured below the P&LNothing
AI todayUngoverned — client data in public tools
Section 3
Your ranked cost map
Ranked by annual cost. The tag on each line is a confidence rating — how firm the number is — not a priority order. Deciding what to fix first is a roadmap.
Where it leaks
Annual costConfidence
Manual policy & case admin
£260kEstimated
Licence & tool waste
£90kConfirmed
Manual reporting assembly
£58kConfirmed
Disconnected systems
£44kUnmeasured
Total addressable
£452k/yr
What the tags mean. Confirmed — from your measured data. Estimated — reconstructed from benchmarks, not measured directly. Unmeasured — not yet measured. So you know exactly how firm each number is.
✓ Every line pays for itself in recovered time and money · the report is yours to keep
Where to start · recovery roadmap

Recover in this order.

Same four leaks from the cost map, phased so the quickest, cheapest recoveries pay first and the biggest lands next. This is a recovery roadmap for money already leaking today — not a multi-year build. And it runs both ways: the capacity you free is capacity to grow the top line, not only cost taken out. When the question turns to what to build next, that is the Growth Readiness Roadmap. Click any step for what recovering it looks like.

£452k/yr
The ROI is the recovery£452k a year in leaks you can recover — against one fixed diagnostic fee. Illustrative, on this worked case; every line pays for itself.
Weeks 1–4 · quick wins+£148k/yr
Months 2–4 · the big recoveryrunning £408k/yr
Ongoing · the enabler£452k/yr total

Illustrative, on the same fictional worked case used throughout. Each figure carries the confidence tag from the cost map above; the order is by return, not by size.

What you get at the end

You walk away with a written report — yours to keep.

This is the deliverable, not a sales follow-up. Everything below is written up in one document you own and can take straight to your board, your PE investors, or another firm — whether or not you go further with us.

Ranked list of operational bottlenecks
Each with an annualised cost figure.
AI FOMO gap report
Ungoverned AI use mapped and risk-rated.
Priority matrix
Ordered by ROI impact, not technical complexity.
CFO-ready format
Defensible to your board or PE investors.
Aimed at 2 weeks* Fixed scope You own the output

*“Aimed at 2 weeks” is a target, not a fixed deadline — the exact timeline depends on your team’s availability for the working sessions.

Where it leads next
Three clear ways forward.

This diagnostic looks backwards: it finds and recovers the money already leaking out of how you run today. When the question turns forwards — what to build to carry the next stage of growth — that is where the Growth Readiness Roadmap picks up.

How the work is staffed

Founder-led. Senior hands only.

Every diagnostic is led by the founders. The method and the P&L lens come from Cezary and Przemek, and they make the call on what makes the report — while a technical lead and a business analyst do the hands-on mapping and costing. No junior hand-offs, no subcontracted bench.

The founders
Every engagement

The thinking is always theirs. Cezary and Przemek shape the approach, direct the work, and own the result — from the first conversation to the final report.

A technical lead & a business analyst
Senior hands

They do the hands-on mapping and the cost model: the real workflow behind the org chart, and a defensible number on every bottleneck. Senior people, working to the founders' method.

Specialist depth, on demand
As needed

When an engagement needs deeper data, architecture or AI-governance expertise, we bring it in for that one engagement. We don't carry a standing bench you'd end up paying for.

Who you'll work with

Meet the founders.

Cezary Bielecki
Cezary Bielecki
Co-founder · External CDO

Cezary leads client relationships and owns the strategic P&L conversation. He has built and transformed operations across healthcare, financial services, and professional services in the US and UK. If the Diagnostic reveals something that needs fixing, Cezary is the person who owns making that happen.

linkedin.com/in/cezarybielecki
Przemysław Wójcik
Przemysław Wójcik
Co-founder · External CDO

Przemek leads the diagnostic and delivery work. He runs the stakeholder interviews, maps the workflows, and owns the output. He's done this across regulated industries where the processes are complex, the compliance stakes are real, and vague recommendations aren't acceptable.

linkedin.com/in/przemekwojcik
No junior hand-offs. The founders set the standard for every diagnostic and stay close to the work, alongside the senior specialists each domain needs.

Every finding has to pay for itself — real time and money recovered, or risk taken off the table — or it doesn't make the report. The capacity we free goes straight back into the higher-value work your people never get to, the kind AI can't do for them. We don't pad findings to justify the engagement fee.

Verified · Healthcare claims · US

$5M to $150M+ in four years.

The same business, in the same market. Tearing down the Manual Wall is what started it — throughput tripled on roughly 20% more staff. The Diagnostic just shows you where yours stands.

Client results verified · name available on request under NDA.

$50M
$100M
$150M
$5M
Year 1
$15M
Year 2
~$30M
Year 3
$150M+
Year 4
Book a free call

Tell us where your ceiling is. We'll tell you what's causing it.

A 30-minute conversation with Przemysław — no sales deck, no obligation. You leave with a clear read on where your margin is leaking and what a full Diagnostic would surface, whether or not we work together.

30 minutes, structured. We come prepared — we ask about your processes, your tools, and your P&L. Not your budget.

You keep what we find. Even if we never work together, you leave with a clear read on where your biggest operational leaks are.

No obligation, no follow-up pressure. If it's not the right fit, we'll tell you directly.

przemyslaw.wojcik@digitalforms.pl
+48 509 103 244

30 minutes · No obligation · No sales deck · You keep what we find

Before you ask

Common questions.

What happens after the Diagnostic?
The Diagnostic stands alone — you keep the output regardless of what you decide to do next. If you want to act on the findings, the natural next step is an Operations Sprint, where we pick the highest-cost bottleneck and fix it in 6–8 weeks. But there's no obligation to continue and no sales pressure at the end of the engagement.
How disruptive is the process?
We run the Diagnostic around your team's schedule. The most intensive part is the stakeholder interviews in week one — typically 45–60 minutes per department head. After that, the work is on our side. We don't require dedicated project time from your team beyond those initial conversations.
We've already had consultants in. Why would this be different?
Most consulting engagements produce recommendations. The Diagnostic produces numbers. Every finding is attached to an annualised cost estimate that has to be defensible to your CFO. If we can't put a number on it, it doesn't go in the report. That's what makes the output actionable rather than advisory.